Показаны сообщения с ярлыком homelessness. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком homelessness. Показать все сообщения

среда, 19 февраля 2020 г.

A Guide to Your Rights in Homeless Shelters

Even in their deepest moments of crisis, people who are homeless in New York City have rights, from the principled (the right to practice one’s religion) to the practical (the right to a bathroom that’s cleaned twice a day). And when a government agency coordinates where you live, and nonprofit agencies manage the daily routine in that place, there are dozens of ways each day that decent living might depend on everyone knowing what those rights are.


The Safety Net Project of the Urban Justice Center, the Safety Net Activists, the Center for Urban Pedagogy and design studio 13 milliseconds this week released a pamphlet outlining the rights that homeless individuals and families have in New York City.


It covers everything from privacy to diet, voting to disabilities, public benefits to income savings; explains supportive housing and vouchers; talks about how to get a fair hearing and how to seek permanent affordable housing.


You can download a copy here.

пятница, 14 февраля 2020 г.

Garcetti proposes new programs to assist homeless

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti announced new programs Feb. 6 intended to help homeless and low-income people start their own businesses, become self-sustaining and develop a strategy to try to keep people from ending up on the streets.

The Solid Ground program will allow people to access the city’s Family Resource Centers to receive financial assistance to pay for rent, bills, food and other necessities to help reduce their costs.

“We talk a lot about homelessness prevention, now we’re going to do something about it,” Garcetti said during a meeting at the Unified Homelessness Response Center in downtown Los Angeles.

The mayor added that the program would provide people with up to three months of support.

Councilman Curren Price said the program could be launched as soon as mid-March, and is also supported by Los Angeles County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

“We can’t build our way out of this disaster,” Price said. “Individuals … are falling into homelessness faster than our services can help them out. We’ve seen the positive effects of these programs in Chicago and New York, and I firmly believe that it can be part of the solution in Los Angeles.”

Garcetti said an average of 150 people become homeless each day in Los Angeles County, but 133 are housed at the same rate, and if the city and county could find a way to close that gap, it could be the beginning of ending homelessness.

Another program that’s coming online is LA: EnterPRISE, which is intended to give people who are living on the street or nearly homeless a chance to get job training and assistance in finding a career path. About 200 people will be entered into the program.

“Every Angeleno should have a chance to nurture their talents, pursue their dreams and earn an income,” Garcetti said. “The goal of LA: EnterpRISE is to empower people in need, to give them the support, training and encouragement they need to start a new chapter.”

Ana Zimmerman, who said she was living in a shelter before she started working with a similar program, FreeFrom, said she was able to move into her own apartment within 19 months by selling inspirational cards.

The mayor said he was scheduled to speak with Gov. Gavin Newsom on homeless issues later in the day, particularly regarding federal and state funding that could be coming to Los Angeles in the near future.

Five shelters through the A Bridge Home program are slated to open throughout the city in the next two months, Garcetti said, and 50 permanent supportive housing facilities will be open by the end of the year through multiple funding sources, including the $1.2 billion Proposition HHH. About 13,000 units will be ready within the next few years, he said.

Independent Wire Services

четверг, 13 февраля 2020 г.

The Bulletin: Peters admits and denies involvement in journo smear

Good morning and welcome to The Bulletin. In today’s edition: Deputy PM both admits and denies involvement in smear on journos, new poll shows National have the numbers, and dozens of Te Kuiti sawmill jobs gone.

NZ First leader Winston Peters has admitted and also denied involvement in a hit job against journalists pursuing the NZ First Foundation donations story. Photographs of two journalists – Radio NZ’s Guyon Espiner and Stuff’s Matt Shand – were published on the BFD blog, while the journalists were in Tauranga to meet with former NZ First president Lester Gray, along with criticism of their stories and alleged motives for publishing them.

Last year Gray quit his role as party president, citing moral reasons, along with “a claim he has been kept in the dark over party expenditure and donations.” The NZ First Foundation story refers to allegations that money given to the Foundation was then laundered to the party itself, thus skipping donation laws. The matter is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office.

So how does Winston Peters come into this all? Well, on Magic Talk (audio doesn’t appear to be online) Winston Peters told Peter Williams “we took the photograph, just to prove that’s the kind of behaviour going on.” What did he mean by ‘we’? Radio NZ followed up on that, and Peters told them that he didn’t know who took the photographs. He subsequently tweeted “NZF has no interest in following Mr Espiner or any other journalists. The very reverse applies. No private investigators have been engaged to follow Mr Espiner or anyone else. A supporter thought it odd seeing ex-president Lester Grey with Mr Espiner so took a photo.” There was no mention of why when Shand was photographed, he was alone and not with Grey at that moment.

As a sidenote, the BFD is a blog that effectively took over from Cameron Slater’s Whaleoil. For an elaboration on just how similar the sites are, read my story from August last year. In an incredible coincidence, the two sites even have the same phone number. And just on the relationship between Peters and Whaleoil, I’d love to draw your attention to his comments when Dirty Politics came out in 2014 – the Nicky Hager book detailing links between senior figures in the National party and attack pieces on political blogs like Whaleoil. For example, this Radio NZ story in which he accused National of using public money to attack private figures through the blog, or this NZ Herald story where he called for a Royal Commission into the allegations contained in Dirty Politics.

And I also want to recall another piece from that time – in fact it also involved Guyon Espiner. In 2014, Morning Report interviewed then-PM John Key about his MPs allegedly feeding information to blogs to be used for political attacks. Espiner repeatedly asked Key, with increasing vehemence, whether or not Key thought this sort of behaviour was okay. As The Spinoff’s Toby Manhire writes, this is a huge predicament for PM Jacinda Ardern. I for one would love to know if she thinks this sort of thing is okay. Unfortunately, as this Stuff story reports, she wasn’t willing to comment.


A brief message fromEmily Writes, Parents editor at The Spinoff

Stories for and about parenting often lack humanity. They generally treat new mothers in particular as if they can no longer think for themselves. I’m proud to be part of a media organisation that encourages us to see each other and celebrate our differences as new parents, rather than pit us against each other for ‘engagement’ in imaginary ‘mommy wars’. If you want to support writing that pushes boundaries and encourages seeing the world in a less insular way, then please support The Spinoff by joining as a member.


A new poll has come out showing National and ACT would have the numbers to govern, proving how close the margins are right now. The One News Colmar Brunton survey showed National with a clear lead over Labour, and ACT’s 2-3 projected MPs putting them over the top. Interestingly – and just like Newshub’s recent survey – it showed the Greens just making the threshold, and NZ First falling below it. National leader Simon Bridges is also climbing in the preferred PM stakes, having now hit double figures in the polls of both major TV news outlets – though Jacinda Ardern still has a whopping lead on that particular question.


Dozens of sawmill workers in Te Kuiti have been laid off, in what is a troubling example of the state of the industry. Stuff has reported comments from Spectrum Group’s Managing Director Wade Glass, who says the biggest problem facing the sawmill is the steady increase in pruned log prices. However, adding to that is the disruption caused by the coronavirus, and that’s something everyone in forestry is facing, given how important the Chinese market is. A sawmill in the nearby Waikato town of Putaruru also closed down earlier this year.


Another really strong piece to share about the state of Auckland’s water – this time focusing on why the beaches are so often dangerous to swim in. Metro’s Tess Nichol has looked at the state of the city’s infrastructure, along with the geography and weather patterns which combine to create the problem, along with what the Council is doing about fixing it. It’s a classic example of the consequences of the city growing way faster than anyone expected, coupled with local authorities spending decades trying to fix problems in an ad-hoc fashion, rather than a big picture approach.


Tackling homelessness has been the focus of a major new government initiative this week, with some serious money put towards it. Interest reports that $300 million all up will be spent on both creating 1000 new transitional housing places, and other particular targeted programmes. There are two important numbers for context. The first is 14,000 – that’s the number of households on the waiting list for public housing, a number which has blown out completely in the last several years. And the second is $48 million – that’s how much the government spent on emergency housing grants in the last quarter of last year, mostly on motels and hostels in the absence of anything else.


A really interesting report about candidate selection within the Labour Party. Newsroom’s Dileepa Fonseka reports that sitting Manurewa MP Louisa Wall could be taken out in a primary challenge, with two potential candidates in the frame to succeed her. Wall has held the seat since 2011, and enjoys massive majorities in both the candidate and party vote stakes. However, there are no guarantees in politics, and it will be fascinating to see who ends up taking the nomination into the election.


Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Drop us a line at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz

Right now on The Spinoff: In her uniquely quixotic style, Madeleine Chapman reviews every dairy lolly in the country. Josie Adams defends the Auckland live music scene from attacks from the indie rock world. Hayden Donnell reviews the new flavours of Kiwi Onion Dip, finding them abominable. I’ve got a cheat sheet on the growing anger around the dross stored in Mataura, and whether mining giant Rio Tinto will help out in cleaning it up. Tara Ward looks back on the achievements of celebrity chef Jamie Oliver. Director Heperi Mita celebrates the achievements of Taika Waititi, and writes about what it means for indigenous creators.

And to my mind, the piece of the day is this remarkable essay by novelist Eamonn Marra. It’s about his new book, which follows a young man with depression – something that mirrors a lot of Marra’s own life. And the essay is a really thoughtful look at what exactly writing about depression serves, and why he doesn’t intend to keep writing about it.


For a feature today, a really interesting think piece on the commodification of online audiences. Writing on Overland, Ben Egliston and Marcus Carter have analysed the phenomenon of Twitch streaming, which is a platform that primarily exists for people to watch other people play video games. You’d be forgiven for not having heard of it, but it has become a pretty massive subculture. Why? Here’s an excerpt that gets into it.

So, how exactly is this labour mediated by Twitch? A viewer’s basic act of opening up a stream and watching it contributes to that particular stream’s view count – a small numerical aggregate of viewers displayed at the bottom of each stream, as well as on the Twitch stream directory. Viewercount is the default way that Twitch sorts streams for viewers. The viewer’s simple watching of a stream, then, contributes to a collective framing of how people feel, think about and engage with content. A larger viewer count might frame a stream as more lively, whereas a smaller viewercount might frame it as more intimate.

Twitch’s chat function is another way that audiences interact. A very busy chatroom might work similarly to the noise of a sports crowd in creating an atmosphere of excitement. The crowd of Twitch Chat creates a sense of ‘happening’, of vitality – of activity, excitement, frustration, elation, etc. This ‘noise’ is often layered into the broadcast by being superimposed over the top of the screen. The experience of watching a popular stream – such as an esports match – derives not only from the content of the stream, but also from the visibility of these audience practices, which allow the viewer to be fully taken up in the here and now of the event.


So the Halberg Awards are in, and the favourites have deservedly won. The Silver Ferns won both the supreme award, and team of the year, after their turnaround triumph at the World Cup in particular, reports the NZ Herald. Dame Noeline Taurua was also named coach of the year. Israel Adesanya and Sophie Pascoe also picked up major awards, and Lisa Carrington continued her annual tradition of being named sportswoman of the year – seriously, that’s four in a row now.


That’s it for The Bulletin. If you want to support the work we do at The Spinoff, please check out our membership programme.

Levin: City’s Approach to Homelessness Still Lacks Clarity

Council homeless report unveiled Corey Johnson Steve Levin

Jarrett Murphy

Speaker Johnson and Councilmember Levin at the unveiling of the Council’s homelessness report on January 30.

New York’s modern homelessness problem, which first gained attention during the Koch administration, predates the creation of the City Council as we know it today.

It wasn’t until after the Supreme Court cast the Board of Estimate to the dustbin in 1989 and the city charter was changed that the local legislature gained its current share of governing power. By then, the crude image of the New York City homeless person—think of a shopping cart next to a cardboard box under an overpass—was indelibly stamped upon the city’s reputation.

Since that time the Council chamber has been where successive mayors tried to defend their approach to managing the homelessness problem, at hearings of the Council’s general welfare committee. In the 1990s, the irrepressible Steve DiBrienza grilled Mayor Giuliani’s homelessness team. In the 2000s a tall, bearded man from Brooklyn pursued a more conciliatory conversation with Mayor Bloomberg’s commissioners during that mayor’s first two terms; the questions got tougher from Anabel Palma during Bloomberg’s final tour. For the past six years, the once-bearded man has been mayor, and Stephen Levin has led the committee.

Meanwhile, thousands slept in the
shelters, their numbers rising and falling, then rising and rising,
on economic winds and policy shifts.

The Council’s release late last month of a report and policy blueprint on homelessness represents something different: a comprehensive and proactive approach to a crisis that multiple mayoral strategies have failed to corral.

Levin joined the WBAI Max & Murphy Show (Live at 5 p.m. at 99.5FM every Wednesday) this week to discuss the report.

Long history, divided management

In surveying the history of homelessness in New York, the report renders this assessment of recent mayors:

New York City has been struggling to address homelessness for decades, with varying success. The Koch and Dinkins Administrations recognized that permanent housing options were important, while the Giuliani Administration took a punitive approach to homelessness, restricting shelter access and criminalizing poverty. The Bloomberg Administration saw homelessness as an incentive problem, and while a key prevention program—Homebase—was created to help those at risk, rental subsidies and priority access to public housing were discontinued, resulting in an explosive increase in the homeless population. The de Blasio Administration has made strides, reinstituting rental assistance vouchers, enhancing street outreach teams to help unsheltered individuals come inside, and drastically reducing the homeless veteran population. But, right now, the homelessness crisis is only being managed.

The Council’s nearly 200-page report, which was two years in the making, proposes steps to address homelessness in all its facets: as a risk to those who could become homeless, a crisis for people who now are in shelters, and a trauma for those who have—for the moment—escaped the system.

It proposes everything from improving planning for those getting out of prison and making rental vouchers more broadly available to increasing the market value of those vouchers, targeting affordable housing to the city’s poorest, creating more “safe havens” and boosting support for those dealing with domestic violence, which is an increasingly visible driver of shelter use.

More fundamentally, it calls for an end to the odd bifurcation in the city’s approach to housing people, which treats the production of affordable housing and the handling of homelessness as separate portfolios (with public housing often as a third, separate bucket).

Need for immediate steps

At the unveiling of the report on January 30, Council Speaker Corey Johnson noted that the city has one deputy mayor who handles housing, and another who handles homelessness. “That makes no sense given the depth and breadth of this crisis,” Johnson said.

Backed by dozens of advocates on the City Hall steps on a frigid morning, the speaker alluded to the “national homelessness crisis” and said the Council’s goal in crafting the report had been to create a “long-term comprehensive plan.”

But he also stressed, “We must take immediate steps like increasing rental assistance voucher amounts.” Most of the proposals in the Council report are steps the city can take on its own, although some of the more significant moves would require support from the state.

“It doesn’t rely on simplistic, single new strategies,” Catherine Trapani of Homeless Services United, who spoke at the City Hall event, said of the report. “It’s not going to be one thing [that addresses homelessness]. If it were, we would have solved it already. It’s going to be lots of things, done to scale.”

Some of what the de Blasio administration has done is working, Trapani said.: Some segments of the homeless shelter census have leveled off in the past year. That is proof that policy can succeed, she said, but also an indication that more is needed.

On Max & Murphy, Levin broke down the report’s diagnosis of the homelessness problem and the lengthy list of fixes it has proposed.

“Some of it has to do with doubling
down on existing policies but a lot of it has to do with things that
we’ve been advocating for for years that are still not done. A lot of
them are things we’ve been talking about for five, six years,”
Levin said, like making sure runaway and homeless youth have options
when they age out of the youth shelter system, and setting aside more
subsidized housing for people in the shelter system. “There’s a lot
of those kinds of common-sense solutions.”

Hear our conversation with Levin above. Below, you can listen to our discussion of the mayor’s state of the city address last week, or scroll down further to catch the full show – which includes discussion about the New Hampshire primary and Bloomberg’s recently unearthed 2015 comments on stop-and-frisk.


De Blasio’s 2020 SOTC: Save Our City


Max & Murphy: Full Show of February 12, 2020


The post Levin: City’s Approach to Homelessness Still Lacks Clarity appeared first on City Limits.

Levin: City’s Approach to Homelessness Still Lacks Clarity

Council homeless report unveiled Corey Johnson Steve Levin

Jarrett Murphy

Speaker Johnson and Councilmember Levin at the unveiling of the Council’s homelessness report on January 30.

New York’s modern homelessness problem, which first gained attention during the Koch administration, predates the creation of the City Council as we know it today.

It wasn’t until after the Supreme Court cast the Board of Estimate to the dustbin in 1989 and the city charter was changed that the local legislature gained its current share of governing power. By then, the crude image of the New York City homeless person—think of a shopping cart next to a cardboard box under an overpass—was indelibly stamped upon the city’s reputation.

Since that time the Council chamber has been where successive mayors tried to defend their approach to managing the homelessness problem, at hearings of the Council’s general welfare committee. In the 1990s, the irrepressible Steve DiBrienza grilled Mayor Giuliani’s homelessness team. In the 2000s a tall, bearded man from Brooklyn pursued a more conciliatory conversation with Mayor Bloomberg’s commissioners during that mayor’s first two terms; the questions got tougher from Anabel Palma during Bloomberg’s final tour. For the past six years, the once-bearded man has been mayor, and Stephen Levin has led the committee.

Meanwhile, thousands slept in the
shelters, their numbers rising and falling, then rising and rising,
on economic winds and policy shifts.

The Council’s release late last month of a report and policy blueprint on homelessness represents something different: a comprehensive and proactive approach to a crisis that multiple mayoral strategies have failed to corral.

Levin joined the WBAI Max & Murphy Show (Live at 5 p.m. at 99.5FM every Wednesday) this week to discuss the report.

Long history, divided management

In surveying the history of homelessness in New York, the report renders this assessment of recent mayors:

New York City has been struggling to address homelessness for decades, with varying success. The Koch and Dinkins Administrations recognized that permanent housing options were important, while the Giuliani Administration took a punitive approach to homelessness, restricting shelter access and criminalizing poverty. The Bloomberg Administration saw homelessness as an incentive problem, and while a key prevention program—Homebase—was created to help those at risk, rental subsidies and priority access to public housing were discontinued, resulting in an explosive increase in the homeless population. The de Blasio Administration has made strides, reinstituting rental assistance vouchers, enhancing street outreach teams to help unsheltered individuals come inside, and drastically reducing the homeless veteran population. But, right now, the homelessness crisis is only being managed.

The Council’s nearly 200-page report, which was two years in the making, proposes steps to address homelessness in all its facets: as a risk to those who could become homeless, a crisis for people who now are in shelters, and a trauma for those who have—for the moment—escaped the system.

It proposes everything from improving planning for those getting out of prison and making rental vouchers more broadly available to increasing the market value of those vouchers, targeting affordable housing to the city’s poorest, creating more “safe havens” and boosting support for those dealing with domestic violence, which is an increasingly visible driver of shelter use.

More fundamentally, it calls for an end to the odd bifurcation in the city’s approach to housing people, which treats the production of affordable housing and the handling of homelessness as separate portfolios (with public housing often as a third, separate bucket).

Need for immediate steps

At the unveiling of the report on January 30, Council Speaker Corey Johnson noted that the city has one deputy mayor who handles housing, and another who handles homelessness. “That makes no sense given the depth and breadth of this crisis,” Johnson said.

Backed by dozens of advocates on the City Hall steps on a frigid morning, the speaker alluded to the “national homelessness crisis” and said the Council’s goal in crafting the report had been to create a “long-term comprehensive plan.”

But he also stressed, “We must take immediate steps like increasing rental assistance voucher amounts.” Most of the proposals in the Council report are steps the city can take on its own, although some of the more significant moves would require support from the state.

“It doesn’t rely on simplistic, single new strategies,” Catherine Trapani of Homeless Services United, who spoke at the City Hall event, said of the report. “It’s not going to be one thing [that addresses homelessness]. If it were, we would have solved it already. It’s going to be lots of things, done to scale.”

Some of what the de Blasio administration has done is working, Trapani said.: Some segments of the homeless shelter census have leveled off in the past year. That is proof that policy can succeed, she said, but also an indication that more is needed.

On Max & Murphy, Levin broke down the report’s diagnosis of the homelessness problem and the lengthy list of fixes it has proposed.

“Some of it has to do with doubling
down on existing policies but a lot of it has to do with things that
we’ve been advocating for for years that are still not done. A lot of
them are things we’ve been talking about for five, six years,”
Levin said, like making sure runaway and homeless youth have options
when they age out of the youth shelter system, and setting aside more
subsidized housing for people in the shelter system. “There’s a lot
of those kinds of common-sense solutions.”

Hear our conversation with Levin above. Below, you can listen to our discussion of the mayor’s state of the city address last week, or scroll down further to catch the full show – which includes discussion about the New Hampshire primary and Bloomberg’s recently unearthed 2015 comments on stop-and-frisk.


De Blasio’s 2020 SOTC: Save Our City


Max & Murphy: Full Show of February 12, 2020

The post Levin: City’s Approach to Homelessness Still Lacks Clarity appeared first on City Limits.