Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Winston Peters. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Winston Peters. Показать все сообщения

понедельник, 17 февраля 2020 г.

The Bulletin: ETS and the accounting of emissions

Good morning and welcome to The Bulletin. In today’s edition: Creative accounting around the ETS explored, Ardern goes to ground on Peters, and ACT criticised for keeping donation from extremist.

Often when reporting on technical and thorny pieces of legislation, it helps to have a specialist reporter looking into it. Stuff’s Charlie Mitchell has come out with just such a story, which brings into question a major aspect of the Emissions Trading Scheme, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by requiring polluters to purchase carbon credits from offsetting schemes – generally forests. And amid wider changes, Mitchell has drilled into a specific and very contentious issue – that major emitters “are likely being over-compensated with taxpayer-funded carbon credits.”

They’re known as ‘Emissions Intensive, Trade Exposed’ (EITE) firms, as they’re vulnerable to overseas competition. It came as a surprise to those organisations, who operate facilities like the Glenbrook Steel mill, the Marsden Point oil refinery, and the Tiwai Point smelter. Mitchell followed up with this story from Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton, who called upon the government to ignore what was described as “special pleading” from such firms. “Free allocation… Should be about protecting the environment. This is not what New Zealand’s current free allocation system does.” Effectively, he was arguing for consistency, or else climate targets wouldn’t be met.

However, it is inevitable that almost every sector will point to a reason why they should win concessions. A version of this can be seen in this Rural News Group editorial, which called on the government to look more into the socio-economic case around exemptions for farming. They were particularly concerned about a removal on the price cap of carbon, which could dramatically increase the value of forestry relative to farmland, so with farms being replaced it could have wider knock-on effects. You might recall last year the farming industry got a good deal from the government to keep it out of the ETS for now.

And underpinning all this is the simple fact that emissions are still going up. They just are, there’s no getting around it, nor is there any point in trying to negotiate with the laws of physics about what an increase of carbon in the atmosphere will mean. And perhaps the example laid bare by Mitchell is fitting, because it’s an excellent case study of a wider trend in how the fight against climate change gets undone by exceptions and creative accounting. That’s the theme of this scorching op-ed about the Emissions Trading Scheme from Greenpeace boss Russel Norman, who notes that in real terms, under the Paris Agreement New Zealand is effectively pledging to raise emissions against 2005 levels, and we’re still not even on track to come in under that target.




A brief message from Toby Morris, editorial cartoonist and illustrator at The Spinoff

I don’t think there’s anywhere apart from The Spinoff that gets what I’m trying to do and would support it in quite the same way. Similarly – as readers you get to make that choice now too. You choose to read The Spinoff, and by becoming a member you can directly support the kind of stories you want to read more of (and, for $8 a month, get a tea towel!). You support us making something new and different – and, hopefully better, you get to read it.




Another day, another round of distancing and deflection from the PM on the conduct of her coalition partner. I recapped the morning of interviews of PM Jacinda Ardern being asked about NZ First Foundation donations and Winston Peters, and at her post-cabinet (scroll down for video) press conference Jacinda Ardern made it clear that she didn’t consider them to be matters worth discussing at cabinet.




ACT leader David Seymour has been criticised for refusing to return a donation from a man who threatened to “destroy mosque after mosque”, reports Newsroom’s Marc Daalder. Activists have accused Seymour of legitimising such far-right extremists by accepting the money, and say that he should either return it to the donor, or pass it on to an anti-racism organisation. Seymour had previously signed a Make Ardern Go Away hat for the man to auction, and did not provide quotes for Newsroom’s most recent story. However, last year he did say “you are trying to conflate something perfectly innocent – auctioning off an amusing hat – with somebody who made some distasteful comments later and there’s no connection.”




Keep an eye out for news on this potential asset seizure case this week. The NZ Herald’s (paywalled) David Fisher has profiled the family behind a fuel recovery company, which stands to lose millions of dollars worth of assets over serious and repeated Health and Safety breaches, which cost the life of a worker. The laws in question are normally used to grab the assets of drug dealers and the like, but in this instance there’s an interesting principle to be tested on how broadly the principles of the law can be applied – particularly if unlawful activity was an integral part of what made the company profitable.




National haven’t actually released the details of the tax cut pledge they’ll take into the election, so my apologies for previewing that early. The NZ Herald’s Derek Cheng has a report on what was in the speech from Simon Bridges, in which it was made clear that the party will offer some form of tax relief, to use the party’s term. There were a range of other goals, mainly around economic growth. One line in particular from the speech was worth a bit more scrutiny – “People on the average wage shouldn’t be paying almost 33 per cent in the dollar.” I tested that claim out here.




An update into the SFO investigation into donations made to the National Party, from Newsroom’s Tim Murphy. He reports that the prosecution of four people is actually over two different donations, both around $100,000, and made in 2017 and 2018 respectively. Interim name suppression continues around the case, but just to reiterate from previous times this story has been mentioned – Simon Bridges maintains that neither he nor the party are among those charged.




Napier’s Mayor is criticising the knee-jerk reaction of blaming gangs for an altercation over the weekend. Kirsten Wise told Newshub that actually, the high-profile brawl wasn’t gang related, even though many immediately ascribed that motive to it. It contradicted an earlier police statement that everyone involved was in a gang, with Wise saying in fact only one gang member was present. It’s one of those things – even if you agree with the view that gangs are a malign and negative presence in the country, it still pays to be fair and accurate.




An $11 million boost will be given to Tourism NZ to explore market diversification, in the wake of the coronavirus. Radio NZ reports places like Rotorua, who generally do really well out of the Chinese tourist market, have been hit hard. Some money will also go towards promoting regional destinations to the domestic tourist market. As someone who has been lucky enough to travel all over New Zealand for both work and holidays, I think it’s brilliant, and wholeheartedly endorse the idea that people should go out and see things closer to home.




An update to the housekeeping: Ignore what was said yesterday about this week’s Bulletin World Weekly – it will actually be coming out after all despite me being on leave. Stepping into the breach will be The Spinoff’s deputy editor Catherine McGregor, just to continue the theme of an all-star team doing the various Bulletins over the next week. A reminder – the Bulletin World Weekly is a world news digest exclusively for Spinoff members.




Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Drop us a line at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz


A barbecue made to look like a tank at Meatstock 2020 (Photo: Sam Brooks)


Right now on The Spinoff: Sam Brooks goes into the manly masculine world of Meatstock. Jihee Junn interviews the co-founder of Stasher, an ‘AirBnb for luggage’ app that has recently launched in New Zealand. Jordan Hamel speaks to Kevin Parker, the lead singer of Tame Impala, about a new album and taking time away from the hype. And Hinemoa Elder writes about the many biases and prejudices that still exist in the world of science.




In the fight against climate change, it isn’t necessarily just about planting lots of trees. As this long-read from the BBC shows, massive thickets of shrubs could also have a really positive effect, both on the global climate and in creating a local microclimate. The example picked out follows some drought-stricken winemakers in South Africa, who a few years ago realised big changes needed to be made. Here’s an excerpt:

“We decided we needed to do something,” she says. That “something” has taken the form of planting one million cuttings of Portulacaria afra over the next five years. This succulent shrub, more commonly known as spekboom, has small, round leaves and is indigenous to the area. When these plants have reached maturity in more than a decade’s time, they’ll be up to 5m (16.4ft) high – more than twice the height of a tall adult. They will cast pools of cooling shadow in spite of the dry heat typical of this landscape. The ground surrounding them will be covered with leaf litter – discarded remnants of their tiny bright leaves – as well smaller shrubs that can flourish in their shade.

The reason for Nel’s enthusiasm and that of many growers in the region is that this humble, hardy, semi-desert plant has the potential to alter both the weather, by bringing rain, and the climate, by absorbing carbon dioxide.




A remarkable and controversial result in a sport that is huge overseas but quite obscure here: Pakistan have beaten India to claim the Kabaddi World Cup, reports AFP, for a title that carries huge prestige in Asia. What makes the result even more interesting is that there’s currently a general freeze on sporting contacts between the two nations, and India’s sports minister has said there will be an investigation into why Indian players were allowed to play under their flag without permission. The Hindustan Times has more detail on that latter point – you might note that in the first paragraph they say Pakistan beat ‘a team from India’, rather than simply India.




That’s it for The Bulletin. If you want to support the work we do at The Spinoff, please check out our membership programme.

The Bulletin: ETS and the accounting of emissions

Good morning and welcome to The Bulletin. In today’s edition: Creative accounting around the ETS explored, Ardern goes to ground on Peters, and ACT criticised for keeping donation from extremist.

Often when reporting on technical and thorny pieces of legislation, it helps to have a specialist reporter looking into it. Stuff’s Charlie Mitchell has come out with just such a story, which brings into question a major aspect of the Emissions Trading Scheme, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by requiring polluters to purchase carbon credits from offsetting schemes – generally forests. And amid wider changes, Mitchell has drilled into a specific and very contentious issue – that major emitters “are likely being over-compensated with taxpayer-funded carbon credits.”

They’re known as ‘Emissions Intensive, Trade Exposed’ (EITE) firms, as they’re vulnerable to overseas competition. It came as a surprise to those organisations, who operate facilities like the Glenbrook Steel mill, the Marsden Point oil refinery, and the Tiwai Point smelter. Mitchell followed up with this story from Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton, who called upon the government to ignore what was described as “special pleading” from such firms. “Free allocation… Should be about protecting the environment. This is not what New Zealand’s current free allocation system does.” Effectively, he was arguing for consistency, or else climate targets wouldn’t be met.

However, it is inevitable that almost every sector will point to a reason why they should win concessions. A version of this can be seen in this Rural News Group editorial, which called on the government to look more into the socio-economic case around exemptions for farming. They were particularly concerned about a removal on the price cap of carbon, which could dramatically increase the value of forestry relative to farmland, so with farms being replaced it could have wider knock-on effects. You might recall last year the farming industry got a good deal from the government to keep it out of the ETS for now.

And underpinning all this is the simple fact that emissions are still going up. They just are, there’s no getting around it, nor is there any point in trying to negotiate with the laws of physics about what an increase of carbon in the atmosphere will mean. And perhaps the example laid bare by Mitchell is fitting, because it’s an excellent case study of a wider trend in how the fight against climate change gets undone by exceptions and creative accounting. That’s the theme of this scorching op-ed about the Emissions Trading Scheme from Greenpeace boss Russel Norman, who notes that in real terms, under the Paris Agreement New Zealand is effectively pledging to raise emissions against 2005 levels, and we’re still not even on track to come in under that target.


A brief message from Toby Morris, editorial cartoonist and illustrator at The Spinoff

I don’t think there’s anywhere apart from The Spinoff that gets what I’m trying to do and would support it in quite the same way. Similarly – as readers you get to make that choice now too. You choose to read The Spinoff, and by becoming a member you can directly support the kind of stories you want to read more of (and, for $8 a month, get a tea towel!). You support us making something new and different – and, hopefully better, you get to read it.


Another day, another round of distancing and deflection from the PM on the conduct of her coalition partner. I recapped the morning of interviews of PM Jacinda Ardern being asked about NZ First Foundation donations and Winston Peters, and at her post-cabinet (scroll down for video) press conference Jacinda Ardern made it clear that she didn’t consider them to be matters worth discussing at cabinet.


ACT leader David Seymour has been criticised for refusing to return a donation from a man who threatened to “destroy mosque after mosque”, reports Newsroom’s Marc Daalder. Activists have accused Seymour of legitimising such far-right extremists by accepting the money, and say that he should either return it to the donor, or pass it on to an anti-racism organisation. Seymour had previously signed a Make Ardern Go Away hat for the man to auction, and did not provide quotes for Newsroom’s most recent story. However, last year he did say “you are trying to conflate something perfectly innocent – auctioning off an amusing hat – with somebody who made some distasteful comments later and there’s no connection.”


Keep an eye out for news on this potential asset seizure case this week. The NZ Herald’s (paywalled) David Fisher has profiled the family behind a fuel recovery company, which stands to lose millions of dollars worth of assets over serious and repeated Health and Safety breaches, which cost the life of a worker. The laws in question are normally used to grab the assets of drug dealers and the like, but in this instance there’s an interesting principle to be tested on how broadly the principles of the law can be applied – particularly if unlawful activity was an integral part of what made the company profitable.


National haven’t actually released the details of the tax cut pledge they’ll take into the election, so my apologies for previewing that early. The NZ Herald’s Derek Cheng has a report on what was in the speech from Simon Bridges, in which it was made clear that the party will offer some form of tax relief, to use the party’s term. There were a range of other goals, mainly around economic growth. One line in particular from the speech was worth a bit more scrutiny – “People on the average wage shouldn’t be paying almost 33 per cent in the dollar.” I tested that claim out here.


An update into the SFO investigation into donations made to the National Party, from Newsroom’s Tim Murphy. He reports that the prosecution of four people is actually over two different donations, both around $100,000, and made in 2017 and 2018 respectively. Interim name suppression continues around the case, but just to reiterate from previous times this story has been mentioned – Simon Bridges maintains that neither he nor the party are among those charged.


Napier’s Mayor is criticising the knee-jerk reaction of blaming gangs for an altercation over the weekend. Kirsten Wise told Newshub that actually, the high-profile brawl wasn’t gang related, even though many immediately ascribed that motive to it. It contradicted an earlier police statement that everyone involved was in a gang, with Wise saying in fact only one gang member was present. It’s one of those things – even if you agree with the view that gangs are a malign and negative presence in the country, it still pays to be fair and accurate.


An $11 million boost will be given to Tourism NZ to explore market diversification, in the wake of the coronavirus. Radio NZ reports places like Rotorua, who generally do really well out of the Chinese tourist market, have been hit hard. Some money will also go towards promoting regional destinations to the domestic tourist market. As someone who has been lucky enough to travel all over New Zealand for both work and holidays, I think it’s brilliant, and wholeheartedly endorse the idea that people should go out and see things closer to home.


An update to the housekeeping: Ignore what was said yesterday about this week’s Bulletin World Weekly – it will actually be coming out after all despite me being on leave. Stepping into the breach will be The Spinoff’s deputy editor Catherine McGregor, just to continue the theme of an all-star team doing the various Bulletins over the next week. A reminder – the Bulletin World Weekly is a world news digest exclusively for Spinoff members.


Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Drop us a line at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz

A barbecue made to look like a tank at Meatstock 2020 (Photo: Sam Brooks)

Right now on The Spinoff: Sam Brooks goes into the manly masculine world of Meatstock. Jihee Junn interviews the co-founder of Stasher, an ‘AirBnb for luggage’ app that has recently launched in New Zealand. Jordan Hamel speaks to Kevin Parker, the lead singer of Tame Impala, about a new album and taking time away from the hype. And Hinemoa Elder writes about the many biases and prejudices that still exist in the world of science.


In the fight against climate change, it isn’t necessarily just about planting lots of trees. As this long-read from the BBC shows, massive thickets of shrubs could also have a really positive effect, both on the global climate and in creating a local microclimate. The example picked out follows some drought-stricken winemakers in South Africa, who a few years ago realised big changes needed to be made. Here’s an excerpt:

“We decided we needed to do something,” she says. That “something” has taken the form of planting one million cuttings of Portulacaria afra over the next five years. This succulent shrub, more commonly known as spekboom, has small, round leaves and is indigenous to the area. When these plants have reached maturity in more than a decade’s time, they’ll be up to 5m (16.4ft) high – more than twice the height of a tall adult. They will cast pools of cooling shadow in spite of the dry heat typical of this landscape. The ground surrounding them will be covered with leaf litter – discarded remnants of their tiny bright leaves – as well smaller shrubs that can flourish in their shade.

The reason for Nel’s enthusiasm and that of many growers in the region is that this humble, hardy, semi-desert plant has the potential to alter both the weather, by bringing rain, and the climate, by absorbing carbon dioxide.


A remarkable and controversial result in a sport that is huge overseas but quite obscure here: Pakistan have beaten India to claim the Kabaddi World Cup, reports AFP, for a title that carries huge prestige in Asia. What makes the result even more interesting is that there’s currently a general freeze on sporting contacts between the two nations, and India’s sports minister has said there will be an investigation into why Indian players were allowed to play under their flag without permission. The Hindustan Times has more detail on that latter point – you might note that in the first paragraph they say Pakistan beat ‘a team from India’, rather than simply India.


That’s it for The Bulletin. If you want to support the work we do at The Spinoff, please check out our membership programme.

воскресенье, 16 февраля 2020 г.

The donations mess reveals a vacuum in our political system. Who will fill it?

Winston Peters was once the one who could plausibly rail against the self-interest of the establishment. Today that seems laughable, So where are the real critics offering reform, asks Danyl Mclauchlan. 

Politics is messy. It’s chaotic; most things happen for complex combinations of reasons and these are not always obvious, and the best explanations you get of why or how things play out are usually pollsters guesstimating effect sizes or pundits dreaming up post-hoc explanations that flatter our own ideas. Hardly anything ever gets validated or proved.

But last week the dark gods of politics seemed to go out of their way to endorse Simon Bridges’ decision to rule out Winston Peters from a future National-led coalition. Bridges has been rewarded with a Serious Fraud Office investigation into the New Zealand First Foundation and more murky allegations around the same foundation showing that it’s been quietly taking donations from the racing industry, while Peters is the sector’s benevolent minister of racing. There have been two polls showing National ahead of Labour and New Zealand First out of parliament, and Bridges is slowly clawing his way up the preferred prime minister ratings.

And Peters himself has rewarded Bridges by performing as the absolute worst version of himself, indulging in classic Peters-style antics, drowning out the prime minister’s electorally vital attempts to remind the voters how much she believes in kindness, forcing her to declare that yes, she still stands by him, absolutely she trusts him, no further comments please; making her look weaker every day.

National Party leader Simon Bridges, prime minister Jacinda Ardern and deputy prime minister Winston Peters arrive at Waitangi in February 2019 (Photo: Getty Images)

The prime minister’s problem is that if she stands up to Peters – say, she suspends his portfolio as minister of racing pending the outcome of the SFO investigation – Peters might reciprocate by declaring that he’s the victim of a giant media/business/political conspiracy and that he might not support the government’s budget: maybe he’ll go fishing for a few weeks to think about it. Cue weeks of chaos and uncertainty and breathless media coverage about the prospect of a snap election, with Peters at the centre of it all.

This wouldn’t be a smart thing for Peters to do, but setting up this foundation and then falling out with senior figures in his own party who leaked its details to the media doesn’t look very smart. Nor was volunteering that he was involved in journalists investigating the foundation being photographed. Nor was Peters’ social media announcement this week, in which he promised to clear up all the questions about the foundation, in which the sound was inaudible. None of this is smart.

Which is all good for Simon Bridges. If you’re a swing voter trying to choose between Labour and National you’ll probably base your vote on which party leader you prefer. That’s not going to work out well for Bridges: even some National voters prefer Ardern to him. And it’s hard for a politician to increase their popularity by attacking someone more likeable than they are, because voters tend to give the more likeable, popular person the benefit of the doubt.

So Bridges is attacking extremely unpopular things, like organised crime and the deputy prime minister, targets that his political opponents (sometimes rather bafflingly) support. This redefines the choice architecture for swing voters. Their decision is not “Jacinda versus Simon”, but rather: “Whose side are you on: Simon Bridges or the Mongrel Mob?” Or “Do you prefer a government with Winston Peters’ endless scandal and drama and inane nonsense, or one without?”

Bridges hasn’t defined himself in any positive way. When asked if he’ll reform the country’s laws around political donations, he demurs. When asked about the Serious Fraud Office’s charges against four as-yet-unnamed individuals involving a donation to the National Party, he stresses that neither he nor anyone in his party is among them, and that his fundraising activities are within the law. It’s the sort of thing all politicians say when implicated in a donations scandal. And it’s usually true, but not because they’re pure as the driven snow. It’s because they literally write the laws, and get to decide what is and is not legal, so the laws around political donations have been written with massive loopholes allowing parties to accept large donations and conceal the identity of the donors. You can – if you like – make a $15,000 donation to the party of your choice every year, $45,000 in an electoral cycle (and that’s before you donations go via family members or legal subsidiaries), and there’s no disclosure requirement.

Political insiders often attempt to define the right to make anonymous donations as a freedom, and therefore something that should never be constrained. (Just last week, Peters compared anonymous donations to the secret ballot.) But it is a long-standing principle of liberal political theory that our freedoms conflict with each other: our rights do not fit together like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. And it seems obvious that the freedom that the richest people, the wealthiest corporations and foreign governments operating through domestic proxies enjoy to anonymously fund our political parties stands in conflict with everyone else’s right to have our country governed in our own interests rather than theirs. The right of companies to secretly fund our political parties in return for policy and taxpayer handouts is not a thing.

There might be some more cosmetic alteration to the electoral finance laws in the wake of this latest series of scandals, but it’s not in the short-term interest of any party in parliament to seriously fix our donation regime. And now, for the first time in a long time there’s no anti-establishment party or figure in parliament critiquing the cozy status quo.

That used to be Winston Peters’ job: he made his name exposing establishment scandals. Several decades ago you could legitimately say of New Zealand politics, “Winston will keep them honest”, without bursting into laughter at the absurdity of the statement. And it made him incredibly popular: in the mid 1990s almost a third of the country named Peters as preferred prime minister (he is currently at 3%). And the Green Party under Russel Norman and Metiria Turei was an anti-establishment party (Turei described it as “an anti-establishment party in the heart of the establishment”), critiquing the security services, the political donation laws, the lobbyists swarming around the last government (and now this one) like bluebottles to a dead cat. This was politically popular – the party once polled as high as 18%, and its internal research showed that as many as a third of New Zealanders were potential green voters. But now the Green Party occupies an ideologically incoherent space bounded by technocratic centrism and campus wokeness, characterised by an obsequious, fawning fear towards Peters and New Zealand First. On current polling it’s not at all certain they’ll be returned to parliament.

But it is in all the parties’ long-term interest to fix our wretched donation laws. Economics lecturers often introduce their undergrad students to game theory by describing how the laws banning cigarette advertising led to a surge in profits for tobacco companies. This was because the advertising was a zero-sum game between the companies. Each company had to spend money on advertising because all the others did. The spending didn’t win them any many new customers, but if they stopped and the others didn’t, they’d lose customers. The spending was pointless – but they all had to do it. It was a coordination problem that no individual player could solve but that was effortlessly solved by the power of the state.

Political funding and political spending work much the same way. None of the billboards that political parties put up every election campaign persuade anyone to vote for that party. But if you don’t put up billboards and all the other parties do, then you probably lose votes. So they all put up billboards, and run print and digital and broadcast campaigns, and invest huge amounts of time fundraising to pay for it all, and it is all mostly pointless. Zero sum. They all do it because it’s a coordination problem that no one inside the game can solve. And there’s no anti-establishment critic to force them to change.

I think there’s a vacuum in our political system. There are obvious problems with the status quo but no real critics offering reform. It’s a situation that Simon Bridges is temporarily taking advantage of, but to which offers no actual, meaningful change. He’ll follow the current laws but since the current laws are designed to be crooked, that doesn’t mean very much.

Lenin used to say that he found power lying on the streets, and simply picked it up. I suspect there’s power lying on the streets in New Zealand politics, waiting for someone to say that our parties shouldn’t be secretly funded by the richest people in the country; that lobbyists shouldn’t be in powerful Beehive jobs, that the country should be governed in our interest, not theirs. And that power is just waiting for someone to pick it up.

четверг, 13 февраля 2020 г.

The Bulletin: Peters admits and denies involvement in journo smear

Good morning and welcome to The Bulletin. In today’s edition: Deputy PM both admits and denies involvement in smear on journos, new poll shows National have the numbers, and dozens of Te Kuiti sawmill jobs gone.

NZ First leader Winston Peters has admitted and also denied involvement in a hit job against journalists pursuing the NZ First Foundation donations story. Photographs of two journalists – Radio NZ’s Guyon Espiner and Stuff’s Matt Shand – were published on the BFD blog, while the journalists were in Tauranga to meet with former NZ First president Lester Gray, along with criticism of their stories and alleged motives for publishing them.

Last year Gray quit his role as party president, citing moral reasons, along with “a claim he has been kept in the dark over party expenditure and donations.” The NZ First Foundation story refers to allegations that money given to the Foundation was then laundered to the party itself, thus skipping donation laws. The matter is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office.

So how does Winston Peters come into this all? Well, on Magic Talk (audio doesn’t appear to be online) Winston Peters told Peter Williams “we took the photograph, just to prove that’s the kind of behaviour going on.” What did he mean by ‘we’? Radio NZ followed up on that, and Peters told them that he didn’t know who took the photographs. He subsequently tweeted “NZF has no interest in following Mr Espiner or any other journalists. The very reverse applies. No private investigators have been engaged to follow Mr Espiner or anyone else. A supporter thought it odd seeing ex-president Lester Grey with Mr Espiner so took a photo.” There was no mention of why when Shand was photographed, he was alone and not with Grey at that moment.

As a sidenote, the BFD is a blog that effectively took over from Cameron Slater’s Whaleoil. For an elaboration on just how similar the sites are, read my story from August last year. In an incredible coincidence, the two sites even have the same phone number. And just on the relationship between Peters and Whaleoil, I’d love to draw your attention to his comments when Dirty Politics came out in 2014 – the Nicky Hager book detailing links between senior figures in the National party and attack pieces on political blogs like Whaleoil. For example, this Radio NZ story in which he accused National of using public money to attack private figures through the blog, or this NZ Herald story where he called for a Royal Commission into the allegations contained in Dirty Politics.

And I also want to recall another piece from that time – in fact it also involved Guyon Espiner. In 2014, Morning Report interviewed then-PM John Key about his MPs allegedly feeding information to blogs to be used for political attacks. Espiner repeatedly asked Key, with increasing vehemence, whether or not Key thought this sort of behaviour was okay. As The Spinoff’s Toby Manhire writes, this is a huge predicament for PM Jacinda Ardern. I for one would love to know if she thinks this sort of thing is okay. Unfortunately, as this Stuff story reports, she wasn’t willing to comment.


A brief message fromEmily Writes, Parents editor at The Spinoff

Stories for and about parenting often lack humanity. They generally treat new mothers in particular as if they can no longer think for themselves. I’m proud to be part of a media organisation that encourages us to see each other and celebrate our differences as new parents, rather than pit us against each other for ‘engagement’ in imaginary ‘mommy wars’. If you want to support writing that pushes boundaries and encourages seeing the world in a less insular way, then please support The Spinoff by joining as a member.


A new poll has come out showing National and ACT would have the numbers to govern, proving how close the margins are right now. The One News Colmar Brunton survey showed National with a clear lead over Labour, and ACT’s 2-3 projected MPs putting them over the top. Interestingly – and just like Newshub’s recent survey – it showed the Greens just making the threshold, and NZ First falling below it. National leader Simon Bridges is also climbing in the preferred PM stakes, having now hit double figures in the polls of both major TV news outlets – though Jacinda Ardern still has a whopping lead on that particular question.


Dozens of sawmill workers in Te Kuiti have been laid off, in what is a troubling example of the state of the industry. Stuff has reported comments from Spectrum Group’s Managing Director Wade Glass, who says the biggest problem facing the sawmill is the steady increase in pruned log prices. However, adding to that is the disruption caused by the coronavirus, and that’s something everyone in forestry is facing, given how important the Chinese market is. A sawmill in the nearby Waikato town of Putaruru also closed down earlier this year.


Another really strong piece to share about the state of Auckland’s water – this time focusing on why the beaches are so often dangerous to swim in. Metro’s Tess Nichol has looked at the state of the city’s infrastructure, along with the geography and weather patterns which combine to create the problem, along with what the Council is doing about fixing it. It’s a classic example of the consequences of the city growing way faster than anyone expected, coupled with local authorities spending decades trying to fix problems in an ad-hoc fashion, rather than a big picture approach.


Tackling homelessness has been the focus of a major new government initiative this week, with some serious money put towards it. Interest reports that $300 million all up will be spent on both creating 1000 new transitional housing places, and other particular targeted programmes. There are two important numbers for context. The first is 14,000 – that’s the number of households on the waiting list for public housing, a number which has blown out completely in the last several years. And the second is $48 million – that’s how much the government spent on emergency housing grants in the last quarter of last year, mostly on motels and hostels in the absence of anything else.


A really interesting report about candidate selection within the Labour Party. Newsroom’s Dileepa Fonseka reports that sitting Manurewa MP Louisa Wall could be taken out in a primary challenge, with two potential candidates in the frame to succeed her. Wall has held the seat since 2011, and enjoys massive majorities in both the candidate and party vote stakes. However, there are no guarantees in politics, and it will be fascinating to see who ends up taking the nomination into the election.


Got some feedback about The Bulletin, or anything in the news? Drop us a line at thebulletin@thespinoff.co.nz

Right now on The Spinoff: In her uniquely quixotic style, Madeleine Chapman reviews every dairy lolly in the country. Josie Adams defends the Auckland live music scene from attacks from the indie rock world. Hayden Donnell reviews the new flavours of Kiwi Onion Dip, finding them abominable. I’ve got a cheat sheet on the growing anger around the dross stored in Mataura, and whether mining giant Rio Tinto will help out in cleaning it up. Tara Ward looks back on the achievements of celebrity chef Jamie Oliver. Director Heperi Mita celebrates the achievements of Taika Waititi, and writes about what it means for indigenous creators.

And to my mind, the piece of the day is this remarkable essay by novelist Eamonn Marra. It’s about his new book, which follows a young man with depression – something that mirrors a lot of Marra’s own life. And the essay is a really thoughtful look at what exactly writing about depression serves, and why he doesn’t intend to keep writing about it.


For a feature today, a really interesting think piece on the commodification of online audiences. Writing on Overland, Ben Egliston and Marcus Carter have analysed the phenomenon of Twitch streaming, which is a platform that primarily exists for people to watch other people play video games. You’d be forgiven for not having heard of it, but it has become a pretty massive subculture. Why? Here’s an excerpt that gets into it.

So, how exactly is this labour mediated by Twitch? A viewer’s basic act of opening up a stream and watching it contributes to that particular stream’s view count – a small numerical aggregate of viewers displayed at the bottom of each stream, as well as on the Twitch stream directory. Viewercount is the default way that Twitch sorts streams for viewers. The viewer’s simple watching of a stream, then, contributes to a collective framing of how people feel, think about and engage with content. A larger viewer count might frame a stream as more lively, whereas a smaller viewercount might frame it as more intimate.

Twitch’s chat function is another way that audiences interact. A very busy chatroom might work similarly to the noise of a sports crowd in creating an atmosphere of excitement. The crowd of Twitch Chat creates a sense of ‘happening’, of vitality – of activity, excitement, frustration, elation, etc. This ‘noise’ is often layered into the broadcast by being superimposed over the top of the screen. The experience of watching a popular stream – such as an esports match – derives not only from the content of the stream, but also from the visibility of these audience practices, which allow the viewer to be fully taken up in the here and now of the event.


So the Halberg Awards are in, and the favourites have deservedly won. The Silver Ferns won both the supreme award, and team of the year, after their turnaround triumph at the World Cup in particular, reports the NZ Herald. Dame Noeline Taurua was also named coach of the year. Israel Adesanya and Sophie Pascoe also picked up major awards, and Lisa Carrington continued her annual tradition of being named sportswoman of the year – seriously, that’s four in a row now.


That’s it for The Bulletin. If you want to support the work we do at The Spinoff, please check out our membership programme.